Ali Hussain
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks

Thousands of families with older cars face paying an extra £245 for their road tax, it emerged last week. From next April, the government is scrapping the exemption for older cars from the highest rates of vehicle excise duty.
The move was in the small print of the March budget, but the full implications were only recognised last week.
In the 2006 budget, the then chancellor, Gordon Brown, introduced a new highest rate of duty - band G - but said that no car registered before March 23, 2006, would be affected.
However, under the new tax regime announced by Alistair Darling in the March budget, which will come into effect next April, there will be no exemption from the highest band - and the rates are going up.
Owners of family cars such as the Ford Galaxy, the Ford Zafira, the Renault Espace and the Volvo XC90 face an increase in duty of up to £245 by 2010.
A seven-seater Renault Espace 3.5 V6 Initiale auto, with a CO2 rating of 289g per km, currently avoids the top band G rate (£400) if it was purchased before March 23, 2006. Owners are charged only £210, the rate for cars in the next band down.
However, with the scrapping of the exemption, and the introduction of new charging bands next year, the vehicle would be in band M, costing the owner £440 next year and £455 in 2010.
Steve Fowler, editor of What Car? magazine, said: “It's a great thing that the government is encouraging us to buy greener cars, but to penalise people who bought cars before the green agenda had such a high profile, especially families that rely on their vehicles, seems very unfair.”
Here we answer your questions on the new rules.
What are the current
rules of duty?
There are seven bands ranging from A-G. Cars in the A category produce under 100g of CO2 per km and have no duty charge.
There are only two cars in this category: the Seat Ibiza 1.4 TDI 80PS Ecomotion M5 Diesel and the VW Polo 3/5 Door 1.4 TDI M5 Diesel. Cars on the highest band, producing over 226g of CO2 per km, pay £400 a year - unless they were bought before March 23, 2006.
What are the changes
to the car tax?
From next April, cars will be classified under 13 different bands ranging from A-M. A new higher-rate band for cars producing more than 255g of CO2 per km will be also be introduced.
The changes will be introduced in two stages. Next year, the most polluting vehicles will have a rate of £440. By 2010, the rate will increase to £455. The new tax regime will affect all cars registered after March 1, 2001.
It will also see the introduction of a one-off “showroom” tax for new cars by 2010. This will range from £115 to £950 for the most polluting vehicles such as Jaguars and Range Rovers. Those in the next band down will pay £750. This includes family cars such as Vauxhall Vectras, Mercedes M and E class estates, and Mitsubishi Shoguns.
Can I reduce my duty rate?
No. Although you can drive more efficiently and reduce emissions, you cannot change the tax band of your vehicle as this is set by the manufacturer. You can find your car's CO2 rating on vcacarfueldata.org.uk/ved.
Will this affect the value
of my car when I sell?
The increased tax bills will inevitably lower your car's value if it is in a higher tax band.
A Hyundai Lantra 1.6 GSI automatic registered in 2001 is listed as having a trade value of £850. Under the new rules, its value will fall 70% to £250, according to CAP, a car analyst.
Those with a personal contract purchase (PCP) may end up with negative equity. PCP allows you to buy a vehicle by paying off the capital on part of the loan and interest only on the rest. If you took out a PCP of £10,000 over three years and deferred £4,000, you would be paying interest on the £4,000 but capital and interest on the £6,000. If after the three years, the car is valued at £5,000, you can return the car, and still have £1,000 equity for your next PCP purchase.
However, if the value fell below £4,000, you would have to pay extra to settle the balance.
Are there any large cars
with low CO2 ratings?
There are plenty of cars which emit surprisingly low levels of CO2. The BMW X5, for example, which is a 4X4 diesel, emits 214g of CO2 per km. It is presently in band F, costing £210, but next year owners will have to pay £300 and £310 in 2010.
BMW's 5-series 318d, a saloon car, has a rate of 125g of CO2 per km. Owners currently pay £120 a year, but by next year the bill will decrease to £90. By 2010 the bill will be £95.
Another low emitter of CO2 is the Audi TT diesel coupé. This is a well known sports car capable of 0-60mph in 7.5 seconds, but unlike many of its rivals it produces only 140g of CO2 per km. Owners now have to pay £120, but in 2009 they will be charged only £110 and £115 by 2010.
If you are looking for a family car that is a low-carbon emitter, you can go for the Citroën C4 Grand Picasso 1.6 HDi VTR+ EGS. It can carry seven passengers but produces only 150g of CO2, costing owners £120 today and £125 by 2010. The rate will stay the same next year.
What about second-hand
cars?
The new rates only affect cars made after 2001, raising fears that the value of second-hand cars made after that date will fall.
Pre-2001 cars will pay a flat £200 fee, rising with inflation. It means you can own a high polluting car that is eight years old and pay less than half the tax of a new top-band car.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
personally i think it is about time people stood up and said NO to all this tax if everybody said NO and did not pay who would they throw in jail everybody
Tony Hopkins, truro, cornwall
This is a big con ,what about the 2 aircraft carriers we are going to get built with our car tax will the diesel engines be any greener.
brian mcintyre, hebburn, tyne/wear
Every year you get your car MOT'd they give you a print out of your co2 emissions.
If we took the print out to the post office and paid the car tax according to the true emissions of the car, even the older cars.
Everyone would pay the right amount tax.
Do the right thing guys
BJ Davies, Bathgate, West Lothian
Surely it is illegal to bring retrospective legislation?
It is no differnet to introducing a law preventing watering your garden with a hosepipe, making it apply from 2002, then prosecuting everybody who has done so.
We need our 4x4's to negotiate the cart tracks that now pass for roads.
Nigel Hempsall, Pontefract, West Yorkshire
With many car drivers facing ridiculous new taxes, is comrade Brown going to give up his 8-cylinder Jaguar to be driven to his weekend datcha? I somehow cannot see him driving around in a super low emission car, or maybe even riding an electric bicycle around the Downing street area. Not likely.
Peter, Geneva, Switzerland
This is yet another ill conceived "rushed through" idea by a failing Labour government. Its once again using the easiest means to raise revenue i.e. the motorist.
They really dont care it seems if regular law abiding foke are priced out of existence on the roads.
Matt, Hampshire, UK
This is a poll tax on cars.
I expect it will lead to just more cars being driven unlawfully.
If this was truely about Green issues he would transfer tax to fuel so those doing highest milage and therfore plouting more would pay as opposed to retired who may have larger car but do less miles
rodney, eggesford, uk
This is a con. I care enormously about the environment but if I have to pay obscene taxes just for owning a vehicle then I am certainly going to use it - instead of walking. That will not save me money but it certainly makes me feel a whole lot better. Anyone left in the UK with COMMON SENSE?
Ian, Manchester, UK
It is not about being green even slightly. Its about getting everyone onto a 5 year cycle of changing the car. Brown, do your sums correctly, focus on car production, scrapping of the car and put this in your audit and you will soon find that keeping a car running for 20+ years is greenest by miles
francis greensides, bristol, avon
I look after life cycle of systems and can plainly see the effect this will have. Forcing the scrapping of existing cars and increasing the turnover of vehicular manufacture will seriously affect the levels of greenhouse gases emitted - not wholly in the UK, but somewhere Mr. Brown, somewhere......
Mark McLean, Wallingford, UK
The road fund licence has no effect whatsoever on how often, or how a car is driven. It is one of the most unfair taxes from a clueless grabbing goverment that is hopefully on it's way out. None of us like fuel tax either but it is the only fair method of car taxation.
Dave Gibbons, Neston, England
This will do nothing to decrease Co2, if everybody could afford to rush out and buy a new car, the Co2 from production is far in excess of running an older car for longer
Its another tax grab by an inept government, and the sooner they get replaced the better
I drive a car in the highest band....
Roger Spalding, Weeley Heath, UK
Broon, Broon!
Shame it seems it will not actually serve to reduce the greenhouse consequences (rather than keep my perfectly good older car, to afford to travel I may need to get a new one built), and another nail goes in the eco-cred coffin of taxing to adjust behaviour.
Peter , Ross on Wye, United Kingdom
Tax is already levied on a mileage basis - fuel duty is directly related to fuel consumption which in turn is related to distance travelled. Larger, less efficient vehicles pay considerably more than more efficient vehicles to cover the same distance. Scrap the vehicle excise duty.
E Watt, Durham, UK
This completely ignores the whole of life polution.
This will make very servicable larger cars undesired . These cars will suffer far earlier uneconomic repair and hence be scrapped early to be replaced by a new car that conforms to a narrow polution measure. Far from reducing CO2 it will increase.
Neill, Maidstone, UK
If release of noxious emissions is to be deterred or reduced, a significant element of the tax must be the mileage of each vehicle, as high mileage/low emission may create vastly more total pollution than low mileage/highemission. Mileage could be assessed by vehicle licence renewal/MoT cert
john cooney, Esher,
We own a 2000 reg Toyota Yaris with CO2 emissions of 137g/km, which, had it been registered post 2001, would it currently be band C, (next year band E).
Next year a 137 g/km costs £120, but we will have to pay a staggering 67% increase of £200. Unfair or what?
Trevor Boning, Ripon, England
With an additional 10 million cars a year hitting the streets of China these measures are about raising money not pollution control.
Pete, Barry, Wales
Sold for 10p. One general election.
geoff morgan, Falkirk, scotland