2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday
The director was most apologetic. But since we were filming the end of a moving documentary about some soldiers in the second world war it would be best if I was actually on location. Which was in Falmouth, which is in Cornwall, which is as far as you can get from London without being in space.
Choosing what car to take was easy. I’m a huge fan of the Volkswagen Golf GTI
and parked outside was its brand new baby brother, the GT TSI. This may only
have a 1.4 litre engine but it’s boosted with the fitment of a turbocharger
and a supercharger. It sounded intriguing. It sounded like fun.
Choosing how to get there was not so simple. The M4, everyone said, is the
easiest route. This may be so, but it sure as hell isn't the fastest. These
days it’s a car park all the way to Maidenhead, and then afterwards, as the
traffic begins to ease, you have to slow down even more because they’ve
littered the hard shoulder with cones to make it look like there are some
roadworks under way. Pah! It’s just a ruse so they can impose a 40mph speed
limit, which they can then police with “safety” cameras.
By the time you get to Bristol you are either dead from old age or you’re on
foot because you’ve amassed so many points they've taken your licence away.
I therefore opted for the A303, but this quickly became boring so I started
to play with all the buttons. There’s one, near the gearlever, which is
marked with the letter W. Push it and a small light illuminates, but that’s
all.
All the way to Salisbury I prodded it, trying to find out what it did, until I
became so desperate I actually pulled over and broke the first rule of
manliness. I opened the glove box and — take a deep breath — took out the
handbook.
You want to know something weird? There was no mention of the W button in
there. I think it’s just been fitted to keep people occupied on long
journeys. So having decided there was no point trying to fathom the wilfully
unfathomable, I started to delve into some of the sub-menus on the satellite
navigation system.
There’s one that baffled me. It’s a compass, so you get an arrow that tells
you your direction of travel. Fine. But then you also get a dot that shows
the direction of your destination. What’s the point of that? In a plane it
might be useful because you can fly in a straight line. But in a car you
sort of have to go where the road goes.
Still, after approximately 14 weeks I arrived in Exeter, and that,
psychologically, is the end of the journey.
It isn’t, though, as people down there are only too happy to tell you. For
some reason, all petrol-pump attendants in this part of the world ask where
you’re going and then, when you tell them, they explain with a huge grin
exactly how long it will take you to get there. “Falmouth?” said the man at
the till, gleefully. “That’s another five hours!” Why do they do this? Why
does my misery make their day that little bit better? Small wonder they all
vote for the Liberal Democrats.
To make matters worse, I had one small stop to make in Dartmouth, which — said
the petrol man, before I punched him — would mean a three-hour detour.
He wasn’t joking. Devon, if it were a nation state, would be the biggest
country in the world. If it were a planet, it would dwarf Jupiter. And . . .
it . . . has . . . no . . . motorways. You wiggle about in single file,
behind a Liberal Democrat in a Rover, until you reach Torquay, which you
always thought had a New York postcode. And then you wiggle about some more
until the road goes straight into what is undoubtedly the sea.
It turned out that my stupid satellite navigation system had brought me to
Kingswear, which is on the way to Dartmouth, but only if you happen to be
driving Chitty Chitty Bloody Bang Bang. And I wasn’t, so I had to get a
ferry.
God, Dartmouth’s pretty. And so was the girl in Alf Resco’s who made me a
great breakfast, for lunch, and then, after I’d stared wistfully out to sea
— which is what you have to do when you’re making a moving documentary for
BBC2 — I hopped back in the Golf for a six-light-year thrash to Falmouth.
Falmouth, it turns out, is the only town in the whole of Cornwall that isn’t
called Coombe. I don’t know how many are listed in the atlas but I went
through 26 before reaching a place called Coombe, where an old lady reversed
into my car.
That livened things up a bit, but not as much as the sign I encountered on one
of the endless moorland roads between Coombe and Coombe. It was a red
triangle and in the middle was a picture of a bicycle.
What does that mean? That I should look out for bicycles? What, now?
Specifically here? At nine at night? And does this mean that in 10 miles, if
I run over a cyclist, I can sue the council for not warning me that he might
be there? It is the stupidest sign in Britain. It’s even more silly than one
I pass on the M40 most days that says “Spray possible”. Well yes, in heavy
rain, maybe. But in July? In a heatwave? What it should say then is “Spray
not possible”.
It turns out that Cornwall is full of signs, warning of your proximity to all
manner of things, none of which is Falmouth. And none of which makes any
more sense than the infernal W button in the car.
Ah yes, the car. Well, I was most impressed with the ride, but this, I think,
has more to do with the quality of the roads down there in the West Country.
Here, in England, we have to spend our money housing Albanian families while
their breadwinner is away in a prison that we also paid for. Whereas in
Cornwall they think Albania is some kind of skin disease, so they can afford
to iron every ripple in every road every morning.
On roads as good as this, the GT handles well too. But that’s it, I’m afraid,
so far as good news is concerned. The rest of it is rubbish. The headlamps
were set too high, so everyone coming the other way flashed me. The handle
that you pull to move the passenger seat fell off, and then there was the
truly woeful engine. It’s all very well having direct petrol injection and a
supercharger to fill in the black hole while the turbo girds its loins: this
is clever, but my God it’s jerky.
I like the power delivery of an engine to be smooth, like a ball bearing
rolling down a child’s playground slide. In the GT it’s delivered with the
smoothness of someone in a wheelchair falling down some stairs.
And where’s the power? If you’re going to stick GT badges on a car and claim
it delivers 168bhp, then kindly give us some oomph to match. Time and again
I had to change down on hills, and once, with my foot welded to the floor, I
was overtaken by a Mercedes van.
The worst thing, though, is that the GT TSI fails to do any of the things that
you might reasonably expect from a car. It doesn’t make the journey fun. It
doesn’t isolate you from the sensation of travel. And it isn’t especially
cheap. By the time I arrived in Falmouth I was fairly ready to push it into
the sea.
The following day, after a seven-hour drive back to London, up the M5 and
along the M4, I decided that it was one of the five worst cars I’d ever
driven. Yes, the journey, in the middle of the week, in the middle of
winter, was horrid. But it’s the job of a good car to take a trip like that
and make it better.
The Golf made it much, much worse.
Vital statistics
Model Volkswagen Golf GT TSI 3-door
Engine 1390cc, four cylinders
Power 168bhp @ 6000rpm
Torque 177 lb ft @ 1750rpm
Transmission Six-speed manual
Fuel/CO2 38.2mpg (combined) / 178g/km
Acceleration 0-62mph: 7.9sec
Top speed 136mph
Price £18,095
Rating 1/5
Verdict One of the five worst cars ever made
Banged my SL 500 the other day (in all seriousness) and bought the 1.4 i 140 bhp while it went to the garage....Got tiptronic paddles the lot. A great car. This is a fantastic little engine.
stephen brown, hong Kong , hong Kong
Clarkson is a nut-case! Imagine testing a car and not finding out beforehand that pressing the "w" button reduces the torque for icy-road driving...........I hope he managed to disengage the hand-brake before driving it!
Peter, Hunstanton, Norfolk, UK
I recently bought the Golf GT Sport 138 BHP 2 litre diesel and its a fantastic car. Quick and stylish, the blacked out grill and back tinted window distinguish it from the rest of the Golf fleet.
The decision to buy this rather than A3 or 1-Series was a very good one!
James, Bristol,
Just to let you know, before I bought the Golf GT, I was driving a 2003 Saab Aero that boosts a turbo and 210HP.
I cannot believe what Jeremy Clarkson wrote about this machine. I seriously think that he was having a bad day or did not sleep enough. Especially the part where he mentions that he was overtaken by a Mercedes van on a hill! What is that all about? This car climbs up hills like a mountain goat; the torque is so strong that it'll make you feel the headrests every time. I've even raced with Mercedes CLK200's and seen the shame and confusion on old mens faces.
This review is absolutely rubbish. My guess is that Jeremy Clarkson is just getting a little old and too scared to hit that gas pedal.
Okan Gurdil, Ankara, Turkey
Just bought one of these, but the GT Sport version, and its an incredible engine, almost the same power as the GTI and 38mpg!! Each to their own, but come on how can he slate it this badly!
Ben, Twickenham,
The engine works great in the golf, with the small capacity of the engine compensated for by the supercharger, there is a minimal amount of lag to be felt at very low revs though that you probably wouldn't get with the larger engine.
It sounds as though Clarkson definately had the "W" button switched on to reduce torque through the diff, it's designed to prevent wheelspin in icy weather. With the button switched off the TSI is anything but sluggish.
Nick F, High Wycombe, BUCKS
Well, I am a Top Gear fan but i find this review absolutely not realistic.I mean why is it the car's fault if the headlights don't point as they should? Why don't they adjust them in a VW service? Is that why the car is rubbish? It has the same materials as the Golf GTI (which by the way i own).I did a test drive to a Golf GT and i must say that it has alot of power. Maybe the engine isn't as smooth as in GTI but it is great! It pulls, accelerates fast and stock absorbers aren't as stiff as in a GTI (which makes it more comfortable in driving, not all roads are like F1 tracks you know and i must say the interior of a GTI rattles more after some time than that of a GT or even a TSI due to softer absorbers).Come on Mr. Clarkson,a review shouldn't praise only cars that you fancy.Not everyone has same taste you know. Maybe you like for eg meat or spaghetti but this doesn't mean that fruits or vegetables are rubbish. In fact they are more healthy!And GT has less emmissions.
Dimi, Athen
Dimitrios Kritikakos, Athens, Greece/Attiki
Maybe this will help to identify the "W" button"
...."The Winter Driving Program adapts driving optimally to weather and road conditions. When the switch is activated, torque is reduced when driving off to prevent wheel spin."...
Surely Mr. Clarkson had this deactivated during his test? I'd like to think it's a better animal than implied.
Wolfgang Mika, Melbourne, Australia
Sure, the GT is a couple of thousand pounds cheaper than the Golf GTI, but is it likely to hold its value anything like as well as the GTI? After all, the GTI is the badge with cred, and that's likely to have an impact on used car values.
I'd rather just buy the GTI, or if I wanted economy, to just buy the diesel.
I could see that engine working just fine in a Polo, but 1.4L is too small for a Golf (the smallest engine available in the Golf here is a 1.6L, which is still too small here).
Dean, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
2006 Winners
Best New Engine: Volkswagen 1.4-litre TSI Twincharger
Link -
http://www.ukintpress.com/engineoftheyear/previous04.html
2007 Winner
1-litre to 1.4-litre Engine: Volkswagen 1.4-litre TSI Twincharger
Link -
http://www.ukintpress.com/engineoftheyear/winners_07/1_14.html
Reviewed by: 62 No. International Motor Journalists
"Verdict: One of the five worst cars ever made"
Reviewed by: Jeremy Clarkson
ONE AND LONELY!!!! I would say....
Jim, Cyprus,
I' ve recently bought this car and it is absolutely amazing! And I am not new to turbo charged engines, I' ve even driven a 400hp Seat Leon among others.
The overall feeling of the car is great and very GTI-like while being frugal and economic at the same time.
As far as Mr. Clarkson's review is concerned, I wonder what was in his breakfast that day!
It is absolutely hilarious to read it but-hey-it's not the first biased review where Mr. Clarkson plays the "I am the one and only" car expert guy in the planet! We've got used to him.....
John, Athens,
I think Jeremy must have had a pre production test mule by the sounds of it. Given that he found the acceleration not smooth.
I really do think Jeremy must have been having a bad day that day.
I recently test drove the GT and loved every minute of it. Apart from a very small lag at take off I thought the power was very linear.
My only gripe is that here in Australia only 420 available and most of them are sold so I have to wait for the next batch in 4 Months. Also I hate the fact Australia gets it a good 12 months after the UK.
I hear that a 1.9 Ltr TSI engine is being/has been developed which will probably land in the GTI with 7 speed DSG. I cant wait for that. Will probably have to wait 200 years for that to reach Australia.
Swov Kutny, Port Lincoln, Australia
I've recently bought a Golf GT and can't beleve Clarkson's review, it's a stunning car with a stunning engine, as for his comments on performance, it's only 0.7 sec slower than the GTI to 62mph, try and count 0.7secs and you see what a tiny differance this is.
Clearly he's woken up on the wrong side of the bed and taken a wrong turning or ten.
Read every other review on this car and it's consistanty praised.
Clarkson is a brilliant as far as I'm concerned, but sometimes he forms opinions on his mood as opposed to the car.
Robert Macnaughton, Glasgow, Scotland
Why on earth should Clarkson re-review this car? If he didn't like it once is he really going to come over all funny and have a revelation? See the light?
My money would have to be on the "No, he'll still hate it" option. Just because two blokes disagree doesn't make Jeremy wrong. It's an opinion he's expressing, disagreeing or agreeing with him is all part of the fun.
I bet it is rubbish though.
Richard, Sheffield,
I quite agree, Phil, Jeremy Clarkson is well off the mark and should re-review this vehicle given that some ppl may mistake his comments as fact, hmm.
He doesn't stop here either, he continues his rant in the recent Lamborghini Murciélago LP640 review:
"I remarked recently in these pages that a VW Golf GT had failed to make the journey from London to Cornwall anything more than a chore. It didnt soothe, or excite, or do any of the things that a car must do if its to be something more than a personal transportation module".
Interestingly the TOPGEAR website rates both the GT TSI and GT TDI on roadtests, obviously no jeremy behind the wheel.
Richard Kealey, Glasgow, UK
I think you'll find the W stands for "Winter Progam" which sures up the traction system and restricts the accelectration for safer driving in icey and snowy conditions. Without this activated I think Jeremy would find overtaking Mercedes vans and plenty of other vehicles a breeze. There are bucket loads of power available in the GT, and thanks to the smaller engine this car is 100kg lighter than the GTI and only fractionally slower.
No wonder he struggled if the Winter Program was engaged the entire time.
If you are going to review a car, perhaps your reviewers should research how it works first. Quite funny really!
Phil, London, UK