The quintessential Bond girl. Diamonds are Forever, free with The Times today
It’s inevitable that sooner or later someone is going to crash into you. And when he finally does come pranging in from behind, I don’t want my kids to be one of the first things he hits. So whatever crash data the manufacturers give out to prove that putting extra child seats into what would otherwise be the boot of a compact car isn’t actually dangerous, I’m still not going to let my children test the theory.
The Honda FR-V’s solution to this common concern of the family driver is
simple. It sits three in the front and three in the back, leaving a nice big
boot to carry your luggage and soak up the bulk of other people’s suicidal
excesses. And for this reason alone, if you need a sixth seat it deserves
your undivided attention.
And even if you don’t, it’s still worth a look. By the standards of some
compact MPVs, the FR-V has a pretty inflexible interior: the outer rear
seats don’t slide and none can be removed, but a neat piece of design means
that even quite a small child can travel up front with his or her parents.
That centre front seat slides all the way back until it hits the rear-seat
squab, so a child can still sit “in the front”, but remains sufficiently
rearward not to be hit by an airbag designed to restrain an adult.
The system, however, is not perfect. The FR-V turned up with a plastic sign
draped over the centre front seat opining how wonderful it would be if your
baby could travel up front with you, only for its handbook to specifically
preclude such a possibility. Under no circumstances should a rearward-facing
baby seat be used up front.
Problem two occurs when you need to carry six people. You cannot then have any
small child in the front as sliding back the centre seat will crush the legs
of whoever is directly behind, so it’s older children and grown-ups only, at
which point elbow room becomes so limited you end up feeling like a tinned
sardine.
There are two petrol-powered FR-Vs available, with a 1.7 litre engine and
five-speed gearbox or a 2 litre with six-speed. Diesel power is what
everyone wants in this class but it won’t be in the FR-V until later this
year, though given it will be the same superb 2.2 litre engine already in
the Accord, the wait should be more than worth it.
In the meantime the 2 litre 148bhp car provides competitive performance and a
comprehensive list of standard equipment which, if you choose the Sport
model I drove, includes climate and cruise control, leather covers for the
wheel and gearlever, and alloy wheels for a reasonable £16,400.
The six-speed gearbox, however, is not quite the bonus you might expect, as
Honda has misjudged the gearing and made sixth too tall, presumably in an
attempt to maximise economy and refinement. In the event, however, so
glacial is top-gear acceleration that you are forever shifting down to fifth
to regain speed or even maintain it up inclines.
Also, engine refinement is hardly an issue when there is so much wind noise.
At an 80mph cruise there is a persistent whistle that I could not live with.
At first I thought the problem might be specific to the test car but it has
been complained about elsewhere.
The FR-V also brought the niggling suspicion that Honda’s usually exemplary
construction standards are not being maintained. The cheap plastic on the
centre console looks downmarket next to the interior fittings of, say, a
Ford C-Max, and the footrest came adrift a number of times during my week
with the car. It’s a small point but perhaps significant: in all the years
I’ve been doing this I can’t remember anything ever falling off a Honda.
Otherwise it performed well. There’s good room front and rear, the boot is
competitively large, and dropping the rear seats (which fold flat into the
floor) requires neither brute force nor a degree in automotive engineering.
Because the seats cannot be removed, its ultimate load capacity is rather
less than rivals that let you leave the rear chairs at home, but for most
people most of the time it will accommodate their friends, family and
luggage with ease and space to spare.
All of which leaves me reasonably well disposed towards the FR-V. Like so many
Japanese products, it breaks no real new ground but takes someone else’s
original idea — the Fiat Multipla offered 3x3 seating six years ago — and
refines it. If you don’t need the sixth seat I’d say a C-Max is still a
better bet, and come what may you should wait for the diesel. But if you
like the idea of your child being in the front with you as much as you hate
the idea of them sitting in a rear crumple zone, then the case it makes for
itself is real and compelling.
The valve on my diesel enginged Honda FRV was replaced at 1200 miles and the fuel consumption rose drastically. The car has now covered 3,700 miles and there has been no improvement.
During the first 1200 miles of gentle driving I averaged between 48 to 51 miles per gallon and since the recirc. valve was changed it is impossible to get more than 41.5 miles. I should stress that the car is used only as a weekend car and is never driven in town so all the miles have been on duel carriageways at between 60 to 70 mph on trips of at least 100 miles.
The car has been back to the Honda main dealer who replaced the valve who says that there is nothing wrong. I have telephone Honda Customer Services many times and on each occasion they are unable to talk to me and insist that some one will call me back but no one ever does. I have written to Honda Customer Services who have not bothered to reply. I have always thought that Honda was a company famed for Customer Service and I wonder given the way I have been completely ignored that there is a problem with the retro fitted exhaust gas recirc. valves that Honda canât fix.
Tosh Maclean, Chelmsford,