Andrew Frankel
Pick up classic Hitchcock thrillers all this week, only in The Times
You’ve heard the stories: Jaguar’s in such a bad state it can’t even sell
itself. Over the past few weeks it has been portrayed as a
multi-billion-dollar albatross around the neck of Ford, lacking in
leadership and ideas, not to mention product tuned to the 21st-century
public.
Well here’s another Jaguar story, and for once the news is good. You’ll be
reading a lot about this new XKR over the next few weeks so you’d better get
used to “best Jag since the E-type” headlines. This doesn’t interest me at
all. What does excite me is that within 10 miles at the wheel I suspected
this Jaguar was not simply more charming than its rivals from BMW and
Mercedes, it was plain better, too. Now, several hundred miles down the
road, I’ m convinced. And that is a story worth telling.
With 420bhp from its supercharged V8 motor it is not only 20bhp more powerful
than the old XKR, it is also 80kg lighter (100kg if you order the
convertible). That’s enough to knock its 0-60mph time below the 5sec mark,
where performance moves from fearsome to feral. When I drove the standard
300bhp XK at the beginning of the year it didn’t feel underpowered, but the
XKR adds 120bhp to its output. Just as importantly, the XKR has been
seriously stiffened to cope with the extra performance.
It turned out to be one of those cars I had the deepest difficulty getting out
of. I only had it for three days but still put an impolite number of miles
on its clock. Trip to London? That’ll be the Jaguar. Long day in the office
and need to clear the head on some mountain roads? XKR keys, please. Got to
take the recycling to the tip? What’s wrong with two journeys?
Actually, even I couldn’t quite make sense of taking the XKR to the rubbish
dump twice, but in every other environment it provided a near perfect blend
of point-to-point efficiency and character, perhaps the two most important
traits for any true GT. Most of the time its supercharger is effectively
bypassed so the car behaves much as would an XK, but when you demand an
instant slug of power, where the XK feels swift and sharp the XKR is little
short of savage.
Nor has its long-distance demeanour been spoilt by its stiffer springs and
reprogrammed electronic dampers. The ride is firmer than that of the XK, but
a hard ride need not mean a harsh ride: if your suspension people know their
stuff it can actually improve comfort by giving better control of vertical
and lateral movements. This is still a car you could drive all night and
emerge from more interested in breakfast than bed.
The XKR shows that whatever the trouble at the top, Jaguar still has enough
engineering talent to make up in clear thinking and inspired design what the
company lacks in cash. And at least the bits that aren’t so good — the
tacked-on rear spoiler, naff “R” logos, telescopic aerial and the quality of
some interior fittings — are all cosmetic.
Early indications are that Jaguar is going to struggle to build enough XKRs to
meet demand, a sign the brand has not yet been damaged beyond repair. And it
has been announced that the XKR will race at international level next year,
which should bring tears to the eyes of everyone who can remember Jaguar’s
C-type, D-type, XJR9, not to mention the XJ13 on page 4-5. A return to Le
Mans is not out of the question.
But we should not get too far ahead of ourselves. Jaguar will make money from
its XKs but nothing like enough to staunch the haemorrhage of cash leaking
from its less successful models. The future depends on 2008’s successor to
the lovely but unloved S-type and a desperately needed radical facelift of
the staid-looking XJ saloon. At last week’s Paris Motor Show Jaguar
executives were chatting excitedly about these cars and even, in the future,
an ultra-sporting Porsche Boxster and Cayman rival — the oft-mooted F-type.
If these cars can be delivered and the X-type ditched, and if they build on
the standards seen in the XK and XKR, there’s not only a future out there
for Jaguar, it could be a bright one, too.
THE OPPOSITION
Model BMW 650i Sport £54,870
For Affordable by these standards, room in back, handling
Against Odd looks, characterless to drive, and it's got iDrive
Model Mercedes SZL 500 £75,925
For Coupé and a convertible in one, strong engine, looks
Against Two swats only, ageing interior, limited boot space
tbh the back is lovely but the headlight arrangement looks like they cost about 50p , those reflectors look so cheap .Look more like the headlights of a hyundai.....sry this has been bugging me since it was released.
gm, stafford, uk
I have owned an X type for three years and found it to be as good if not better than my previous BMW so lets get behind jaguar and say well done and keep the inovations going
Jeffrey Harrison, Waltham Abbey essex,
I never understand why people are so rude about the X type.
I had one for four years .. i found it's performance and quality far superior to its price , and equally as good as competing BMWs, Audis etc.
It's interior finish and design was far superior to the black plastic of it's German rivals and it's by and large made in Britain ... Why on earth should someone buy a foreign car when a British made one is equally as good if not better .... It is completely beyond me ... French and German loyalty to their own products has ensured they still have a successful motor industry .. British obsession with 'image' has more or less condemned this nation to drive around in foreign made vehicles ... pathetic ! !
andy, Lyon, France