2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now

Think of a supercar and you think of a flawless Italian sportster cruising a sunlit road in Monte Carlo or revving up a switchback Alpine pass. You probably don’t envisage it upside down in a ditch or scythed in half in the middle of a debris-strewn Broad.
But increasingly that is where you are likely to find them, sparking claims that a new generation of fantasy cars are becoming too hot for their owners to handle.
Take the Lamborghini Murciélago LP640. It replaced the original Murciélago late last year, upping the power output from 580bhp to 640bhp and taking the top speed to 210mph. The Italian company claimed it was the fastest Lambo ever, and millionaire customers flocked to sign up and buy one.
The problem was that few of them had the skills to drive it at speed. In its first three months of sale, three LP640s were written off in high-speed crashes as drivers, seduced by the firepower of the V12 engine, drove way beyond their abilities or the car’s limits.
Valentino Balboni, Lamborghini’s own test driver, crashed his LP640 last year. He was lucky and walked away. Two weeks earlier an Austrian dealer was not so fortunate: he was hospitalised for weeks after pushing his LP640 too hard.
The latest smash was in November, when an LP640 on loan from Lamborghini spun off BBC TV’s test track in Dunsfold, Surrey in heavy rain, putting it in the repair workshop for two months. The driver — who has not been named — was unhurt.
It is not just Lamborghinis that seem to be crashing. Last week, in the latest of a spate of crashes involving Ferrari’s flagship car, a yellow Enzo was written off in Dubai after the driver lost control.
In November Suleiman Kerimov, a 40-year-old Russian billionaire politician, made headlines around the world when he — allegedly with Tina Kandelaki, a lingerie-wearing FHM cover star in the passenger seat — crashed into a tree on the French Riviera, leaving Kermimov seriously burnt. The previous month Gary Eisenberg, a Ferrari collector, died at the wheel of his Enzo in California.
All of which is meat and drink to the website www.wreckedexotics.com. This is a fast-growing site attracting 500,000 users each month, and is dedicated to documenting the aftermath of supercar crashes.
It has spawned an eagle-eyed community of online rubber-neckers keen to see images of the latest six-figure write-off. It is also the perfect tonic for anyone who has suffered a kerbed alloy or scratched paint job on their Volvo and balked at the repair bill.
“Many submissions carry tales of inexperienced drivers or friends borrowing cars and totalling them, sometimes fatally,” says Gregg Carlson, the website’s publisher. “Most exotic cars are relatively safe when it comes to protecting the occupants in a crash, and there are many examples of terrible crashes where the driver walked away — most notably a recent Enzo crash at 200mph in Malibu, where the driver only had a cut lip.”
But there is a more serious side to the high number of supercar crashes. Some commentators claim they are a sign that car makers have become embroiled in a horsepower arms race, creating ever more powerful engines that drivers are struggling to control.
“I think people are locked into a situation where each successive car is expected to outperform its predecessor,” says David Browne, head of transport design at Coventry University. “We need some sort of truce to be called to say enough is enough. You get into situations where people clearly can’t control these cars, and wealth and inexperience is an awkward combination.”
Part of the problem facing makers of exotic cars is that today even relatively mundane cars often boast performance figures that would have been unheard of 10 years ago. In the mid1990s Ferrari, Lamborghini and Porsche could be confident of their place at the top of the high-performance car league. But today more mainstream manufacturers are catching up fast.
Audi’s current 4.2 litre RS4 quattro boasts 450bhp — far more than the Ferrari Testarossa from the 1980s and 1990s — while the range-topping BMW 7-series manages 445bhp — 60bhp more than the original Lamborghini Countach. Even the lowly £31,000 BMW 335i SE breaks the 300bhp barrier, putting it in the same league as the 1996 Aston Martin DB7 Volante, which boasted 335bhp.
Meanwhile cars such as the VW Golf have seen power output almost double since their first appearance. The original Golf GTI had 108bhp, the latest version has 200bhp.
Manufacturers deny they are on a power binge and claim that extra performance is necessary because of increased weight: modern cars are significantly heavier than previous generations as a result of new safety equipment and electronic driver aids.
But not all the power increases can be put down to the fact that cars have more weight to lug around, and the increases look likely to continue into the coming year: Mercedes has released a limited-edition SLR costing £340,000 (see pages 4-5), uprated from 620bhp to 650bhp, while Audi has just launched its 420bhp R8.
Many thought that raw power had peaked with the Bugatti Veyron, boasting a faintly ludicrous 1,001bhp and a top speed of 253mph. But in November 2006 Bristol, the small-scale British maker of bespoke cars, announced a revamped version of its Fighter two-seater with 1,012bhp and the potential to reach 270mph.
Where will it all end? In a ditch, probably, or else in the dock. Next month Porsche will be in court in America accused of failing to provide adequate training to a man killed while driving in a 205mph Porsche Carrera GT.
The lawyer acting for the man’s widow is Craig McClellan, who has form when it comes to holding makers to account: in 1981 he acted for the widow of a passenger killed in a Porsche 930. The jury found the Porsche was too dangerous for the average driver to handle with no experience and awarded $2.5m to the plaintiff.
This time McClellan is arguing there is a design defect with the Carrera GT that makes it “tail happy”, and that the car is too difficult for the average driver to handle at high speeds without instruction — claims that Porsche vigorously denies.
The trial date is set for next month and there will be testimony from expert witnesses that design faults make the Porsche inherently difficult to control. However, it will be McClellan’s argument that the German company should be held responsible for the level of training his client’s husband was given that will be watched most closely by other supercar makers.
“It [the car] is defective if the risks of its design outweigh the benefits,” said McClellan from Germany last month, where he was in meetings with Porsche representatives. “If its power and handling characteristics make it too dangerous for the average driver without training or instruction, then it is defective. Porsche should be liable because it sold a defective vehicle.”
The case is unlikely to be replicated in Britain, and car manufacturers such as Lamborghini, Ferrari and Porsche say they offer a voluntary course so that customers can practise driving powerful cars.
According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, however, such training should be mandatory. “We have never seen any justification for producing road vehicles with such excessive speeds, and given these speeds it’s not surprising people are getting into serious trouble in these cars,” says Kevin Clinton, RoSPA’s head of road safety.
“Whoever is selling them has a responsibility for providing training on how to handle these cars, as a condition of sale.” But until that happens, www.wreckedexotics.com is unlikely to run out of material any time soon.
The wrecks are piling up
Nice 2006: Russian billionaire Suleiman Kerimov lost control of his borrowed 217mph Ferrari Enzo on a rain-slicked Promenade des Anglais on the French Riviera. The car hit a tree and burst into flames. While Kerimov’s FHM cover-girl passenger escaped serious injury, allowing her to fly home to Moscow and deny she was ever in France, Kerimov is still recovering from his life-threatening burns.
Los Angeles 2006: Swedish fraudster Stefan Eriksson crashed his Enzo, while drunk, at 199mph on the Pacific Coast Highway. A videotape recovered from the car showed he was racing a Mercedes SLR at the time. The Enzo broke in two but Eriksson suffered only a cut lip. After the accident he was arrested and found to be facing a long list of other charges including embezzlement and gun possession. He is currently serving three years.
Sheffield 2005: Naseem Hamed, the former world featherweight champion, wrecked his 210mph Mercedes SLR McLaren while attempting to pass a Ford Mondeo. He crossed a solid white line at 90mph, hitting Anthony Burgin head-on. The accident not only wrecked the £300,000 McLaren, but fractured “every major bone in his [Burgin’s] body”. Hamed was released from jail in September after serving four months, and was stripped of his MBE.
Milan 2005: One evening, Milanese residents reported seeing a red Enzo blasting though the streets. Next morning the car’s wreckage was found strewn over hundreds of yards of a Broad outside the city, along with the body of its driver, businessman Stefano Sidoli, 41, who paid the ultimate price for his passion.
You need a special licence to drive a truck or other large vehicle. I understand that in the UK there are different licences for manual and automatic cars. Surely it is not unreasonable to introduce a special licence to drive a 250mph supercar on a public road?
Ford (not the car), Sydney,
Craig McClellan the American Lawyer has caused the "power race" between manufactures. Cars are now designed to be so stable and safe, that they can drive a stupid speeds. Cars of the 80's are much more fun at lower speeds than cars today, you can find their limits far more easily (and safely on public roads) in modern cars you have to drive at highly illegal speeds if you want to find the cars limits. Lawyers don't understand that 'Drivers' are always going to want to find the limits of any car. If cars were not so safe, people would drive far more carefully!
Gwyn, London, UK
Daren,
Are you seriously recommending a warning sticker that 200mph might not be a very safe speed to travel at? How about one that cautions against doubling the posted speed limit, or one that suggests roads may become wet when it rains. People don't buy these cars for their fuel economy and trunk space, they know full well what the car is capable of yet it's still their responsibility to maintain control and safe operation of the vehicle. That's the whole point of making people take a driver's test to get their liscence, not to improve their skills, to make sure they understand the laws and legalities involoved with driving on public roads.
Ken, Belleville, IL
All cars are dangerous, thats why there's a driving test.
But taking a driving test at 17, does not give you the skills to drive for the rest of your life. You need to refresh those skills and update your knowledge, no matter what age you are, or what car you drive.
John Marriott, Crowthorne, Berkshire, England
The same thing happens with motorcycles and middle aged drivers. however, the manufacturers have come with a training course in the US of A given by the MSF, Motorcycle Safety Foundation. Is this enough, I think not. I believe that the manufacturers of these super cars should spearhead the training of their customers and not wait when the courts ask them to.
Robert H. Bruce, San Jose, Costa Rica
I have no objection to very powerful cars. If these people crashed them at very high speed they are at fault - apart from sections of unrestricted autobahn, they were breaking the law , not to mention if they can afford such an expensive car, they should have paid to learn how to use it properly - to hold the manufacturer at fault is another example of people not taking responsibility for their own actions.
Paul, Preston, UK
Agree with most of commentators to an extent, just to be nerdy the Audi RS4 and newly released R8 have the same 420bhp 4.2 V8.
Ref: http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/driving/features/article586585.ece
ed, ottawa/kingston,
These vehicles are just a Malthusian culling of enormously rich and enormously stupid men (its never a woman behind the wheel: quelle surprise), and thereby bringing balance to The Force young padawans
kevin, kyiv, ukraine
Saying that it is the cars causing these accidents is like saying pencils cause spelling errors. People don't take responsibility for their actions. This is a people problem, not a horsepower problem.
Apex Oversteer, Maryville, TN,
Live with your own faults and accept the cosequences-- have a car accident etc-- it's no-ones fault except your own
Paul, Punta del Este, Uruguay
A mandatory driving course? That'll be on a track, which is designed with crashing in mind (crash barriers, tire walls, sand traps, run off areas etc.) How is that going to be useful on the road exactly? In the case of this american lawyer, were I to crash because of a poor quality road covering or (no pun intended) a badly placed tree, have I been misrepresented when my taxes paid for said defective road and killed me? Accidents happen; normally when there is an idiot driving.
Keith, Newcastle, England
US is full of such money crazy lawyers that seems to forever put the blame on sellers. Hey, customers are not always right ok? That bugger drove way out of the speed limit and you wanna sue porsche? Sue the freakin government that allows Porsche to sell those damn uncontrollable cars. America is ruled by lawyers.
" If Porsche would've given me a training course, I'm sure I'll be able to swerve right off that darn tree at 350km/h"
Paris Hilton , CA,
I'd like to agree with some of the commentators, but I can't. There are poorly designed cars that are manufactured and put out on the road for anyone with a wad of bills to buy.
Take the AudiTT. The first run of them lifted at speed and caused horrible crashes. They needed a wing to put enough grip to the ground to make them safe.
The Koenigsegg is another car that needed a minor redesign to ensure that it had plenty of grip... Without a wing on the back the car became "tail happy".
When you buy a car and are told that it will do 200+ MPH, woudn't you assume that it wouldn't rip apart or become unable to control at that speed? If thats not the case, then shouldn't there be some warning like "car becomes unstable at 200mph."
This isn't a case of litigation happy people. This is a case of corporate ethics. Say what you do, and do what you say. It's not a proper supercar if it's going to disintegrate or become highly unstable at speed.
Daren , Mpls,
The author writes, "You probably dont envisage it upside down in a ditch." And already I can tell the author is not a real car enthusiast. Where does he think the saying "Shiny side up!" comes from? Or is he going to tell me he doesn't know the most common greeting/goodbye of enthusiast sports car drivers? ROFLMAO.
Foobar, SF, CA
I would like to know how fast the porsche was driving when it crashed, i would be pretty sure it wasn't legal, and even if it was on a track, waivers that drivers sign and insurance covers all of this, anyway the driver knew what he was in for when he purchased it, i can hardly expect the dealer to say, "Y'no, this car is really stable at high speeds, like you were glued to the road,"
I can look from other perspective and say that the whole reason that you purchase a car like that is to go fast. question is where is the line between stable speed without training and speed where training is required and then who would be qualified to educate and then be exempt from fault if a trained driver crashes?
Tony, Bristol,
More of the same, I'm afraid - the Americans are, again, guilty of putting their requirement for a guilty party ahead of common sense. To blame Porsche for making a car which was too fast is like blaming Boeing for making planes which are too susceptible to buildings, or Domestos which is too strong to be used as a beverage.
A car is a tool, if the car is controllable at reasonable road speeds, the manufacturer has done its part. Everything beyond those speeds is there for the owner to explore in the privacy and safety of racing circuit.
If a driver cannot judge what is a reasonable speed for the conditions (little or nothing to do with the numbers on the lolipop) then the driver is at fault, not the car.
Jerome Wright, London, UK
I bought a cook's knife last year. Really sharp. Cut myself the other day while chopping a tomato. I demand compensation - I was offered no training at all. Who will save me from my idiot self?
Simon Gardner, London,
I agree with Theo. This is just another example of the blame culture, where people avoid taking responsibility for their own actions.
If a 17 year old crashes his mum's Nissan Micra because of lack of experience, does this mean Nissan have sold a defective vehicle? Is the vehicle design flawed because the driver was unable to control it? Of course not!
ST, Essex, England
Utter rubbish. The car manufacturers are making cars. Drivers SHOULD be responsible for their actions. The American lawyer case is simply for promoting his fame.
theo, Athens, Greece