Catherine Riley, Motoring Editor
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
So the British motorist is finally feeling beleaguered enough — the threat of the Big Brother approach to tracking every journey by every vehicle has been the tipping point — to sign the petition against road pricing on the Downing Street website. With the petition closing on Tuesday, almost 1.5 million people have added their names at the rate of one a second in recent days.
And one of the more amusing effects of democracy in action has been the comments of one unnamed minister, who said: “The person who came up with this idea [the Downing Street petition site] must be a prat.”
Still, once the petition has closed, every signatory will receive an e-mail explaining the Government’s position on road pricing. Not, of course, that we need to be told. It is, regardless of public opinion, pressing ahead and will introduce the bill in the Commons this spring. This will then allow trials to begin, with the favourite areas being Manchester and Birmingham.
But wait, the Government says, many drivers will save money through these pay-as-you-drive schemes because it will abolish vehicle excise duty (VED) and cut fuel duty. Fair enough. But a hypothetical study for the BBC by Professor Stephen Glaister, an expert in transport and infrastructure, into how much drivers might pay for the congestion they caused, found that a Birmingham commuter might end up paying about £1,500 a year for driving 19,000 miles.
Say he has a band D petrol car, which attracts an annual VED of £125, and averages 40mpg, with fuel duty at 51.5p a litre, the Government would have to abolish it entirely and even then he would be worse off. And with fuel duty adding £23.5 billion to the Treasury’s kitty every year, the chances of any large-scale reduction are slim in the extreme.
The British motorist hands over about £50 billion a year, of which about a quarter is ploughed back into the roads. Your guess is as good as mine as to where the rest goes.
If the Government wants to raise more revenue for public transport, it ought to do something about the estimated two million untaxed and uninsured cars on the roads. These drivers are the ones who drive past speed and congestion-charge cameras with impunity and are increasingly involved in accidents that, leaving aside the personal devastation caused, load the premiums for the average motorist.
So are we right to gather up cudgels and e-march on Downing Street? I don’t think we should bother. After all, there are about 33 million vehicles registered for use on UK roads and given the Government’s track record in requisitioning new computer systems — tax credits, the Child Support Agency, the Ministry of Defence — Big Brother seems to have difficulty locating its own backside, let alone you and your car.
Cutting fuel duty and imposing road-pricing is a mistake, because it reduces the incentive for people to drive small, efficient cars. Furthermore, road-pricing is massively expensive to implement, and no one's found a way to do it without intruding on our privacy even further than this government already does.
Instead, the Government should scrap VED and increase fuel duty, with the combined measure being revenue-neutral. That would make it harder to avoid tax and give people more incentive to drive fuel-efficient cars in a fuel-efficient way.
If the Government really believes that global warming is the greatest problem facing mankind, let it prove it by taxing energy-use rather than car-ownership or the use of particular stretches of tarmac at particular times.
Markus Laker, Eastleigh, Hants, England
why not stop going to wars and us the founds for roads , hospitals and schools.
karim, london, london
Road pricing!!!!! do we not already pay enough through the stealth taxes.There it is again the british motorist being lumbered again...people in rural area's being victims of ill thought goverment policy...where there is hardly a public bus service...excuse me but was not public transport privitised...so what public transport is there...,.that does not add 3 hours on to your daily routine from getting A to B.
we already pay enough throug fuel and road tax for road use, IF there is to be road charging then road tax needs to be abolished at the very least and a reduction in fuel duty to compensate and no congestion charging!!!
The goverment seems to be under the impression that the british motorist has endless deep pockets, at a time when the cost of living is rising everyday and most people are just getting by and stuck in the rut of getting paid and paying bills and pennies left over at the end of the month.
Is it no wonder that credit card debt is at an all time high, as most people are using the cards to get through the month as there salary is not enough to get by on.
It is time to make a stand and let this goverment and any other future goverment know that the british motorist will not take this any longer.
zak, newcastle upon tyne,
This whole situation angers me, public opinion is clearly against this new pricing structure, we the public have made it very clear we don't want this new pricing structure, yet the government is still intent on forcing it upon us. Why? What happened to this democracy that we are meant to be living in?
Simon Scott, Virginia Water, Surrey
Another tax!!!!! don't we already pay enough? And what happens to those of us who provide a health care and domicillary service? Are we to stop working or are we to charge those who need our help to ofset our charges? Another non starter and another reason for the lucky ones who can afford to leave the country to do so.... Lets see if Downing street can cope with mass exodus of skilled and wealthy brits towards fairer and more sensible countries. I am disgusted at the way we are treated iun this country!
E Plotnicky-Javan, Hull,
I think road pricing is wrong,im disabled and need my car to be able to a normal life.Most people can walk and catch public transport .It is just another charge for the people who have a vehicle licence.
Ann percy, Buxton, Derbyshire
The myth is that it's the British Motorist who will pay the charges. It is in fact everybody who buys anything delivered by road - which frankly is everything bar coal to power stations.
Tony, Newcastle,
It is another way of robing teh poor blind. If they give up 5% of their salary it will solve any transport related problems. By narrowing the roads and reducing teh lanes they crated congestion. Look at other European countries they manage quite well. This is just another excuse to rob us blind.
Tuna, Essex,
Charge extra petrol tax and use proceeds for traffic control measures and highway maintenance plus have public transport at a rate that will encourage rather than deter people from using it.
Mrs S J Moore, Haslemere, Surrey
Why not remove from the roads all the cars that do not pay Road Tax and / or Insurance. Increase petrol tax and use the funds collected on public transport.
N A C Moore, Haslemere, Surrey