Win one of 20 pairs of tickets to the London Double Header

Britain’s streets are more crowded than ever — and for once we’re not talking about the traffic. Drive anywhere in the country and you will be observed by speed cameras, traffic-monitoring cameras, traffic-flow sensors, CCTV cameras, automatic numberplate recognition (ANPR) cameras, bus lane cameras, parking cameras and, in London, congestion charge cameras.
Tony Blair claimed last month that plans to introduce road user charging were not about creating a Big Brother state. No wonder: with all those cameras and sensors, it’s already here. There are now 36 safety camera partnerships operating cameras at 6,000 sites across Britain. Local authorities have taken over control of parking from the police in many areas and an increasing number are using cameras to help boost revenue.
Fines have soared. Motorists outside London last year paid out an average of £275,000 per day in parking fines and the number of fines rose by a fifth between 2005 and 2006. Across England income from parking charges (including fees, fines and clamping) has risen from £638.5m in 1997 to more than £1 billion and speed cameras now fine about 2m drivers each year.
Legislative changes and rapid developments in computer, radar and camera technology have paved the way for an ever more sophisticated armoury of automated spyware. Digital cameras make it possible for new-style speed cameras to store thousands of images. The cost of replacing film in old-style Gatsos meant that drivers stood a sporting chance. Only one in four were “live”. No longer: the latest cameras work round the clock.
ANPR cameras can match registration plates against Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency records to enable Transport for London to charge motorists £8 per day to enter the centre of the capital. Police can use the same cameras — in vehicles or in conjunction with fixed CCTV cameras — to search the police national computer and insurance company databases to catch uninsured or unlicensed drivers.
Cameras can now be used to fine motorists who jump red lights, who drive the wrong way down a one-way street or perform illegal U-turns. And legislation is currently going through parliament that will enable local authorities across England to use cameras to police yellow box junctions. Those who get caught sitting in a stationary vehicle on the yellow grid will be fined. Such cameras are already being used in several London boroughs.
Road user charging could add yet more roadside spies, with the authorities already testing “tag and beacon” systems using giant roadside gantries fitted with microwave transmitters that read an electronic device in your car. And of course even more cameras.
Vehicles could even be fitted with “black boxes” in future to record times and locations of journeys to enable the government to charge drivers by the mile. Some drivers have even signed up voluntarily to have their journeys monitored as part of a pay-as-you-go insurance service from Norwich Union.
Britain is now the most spied upon nation in the free world, according to the results of a study by the government’s privacy watchdog, published in The Sunday Times in October. The report found people were caught on a national network of 4.2m CCTV cameras an average 300 times a day.
The biggest difficulty for motorists is keeping track of the escalating number of devices — at the roadside, on overhead gantries, lampposts and poles or embedded in road surfaces — and knowing when they are being watched. But the answer is increasingly simple: always.
In January Home Office documents revealed controversial plans to introduce x-ray cameras. These would be fitted to street furniture at key security sites to take x-ray images that would reveal whether passers-by were carrying weapons in bags or under clothing.
The growing number of wireless broadband networks springing up in towns and cities is adding to the confusion and clutter, with radio transmitters also appearing on lampposts. More than 100 Wi-Fi devices have gone up in the City of London in the past few weeks in preparation for the launch of a broadband service next month.
Of course many people will welcome these developments and many of the devices now lining our road network can help motorists by offering information on traffic conditions, accidents, weather conditions and hold-ups. But so bewildering is their number and variety few drivers are likely to be able to distinguish friend from foe. The gallery of pictures shown here demonstrates the problem.
Directs gantries
These 25ft steel structures near Leeds are part of a government study testing technology that could be used for road charging. Directs is an acronym for Demonstration of Interoperable Road-User End-to-End Charging and Telematics Systems
Cyclops
Tested near Edinburgh and between Leeds and Bradford, these cameras are designed to catch commuters who cheat their way into car-sharing lanes by travelling with a shop dummy or blow-up doll. Such a lane is to be trialled on the M1 next year. Cyclops uses two frequencies of infrared to identify human skin by the way it reflects light
Multi-camera system
Dubbed “super-Gatso”, this device can monitor four lanes of motorway and its three digital cameras can hold up to 60,000 images. Not currently installed in Britain, it can take a picture of the rear of a car, like a conventional Gatso, or the front (to identify the driver) — even at night
Road user charging beacons
Transport for London is conducting a road user charging trial in Southwark involving 500 vehicles equipped with tags that can be picked up by 21 gantries fitted with cameras and electronic beacons
Trafficmaster sensors Infrared devices on 1,100 motorway bridges and gantries. They help drivers avoid jams
Trafficmaster cameras Great news — these are not speed cameras. Located at 3,000 sites across Britain they measure traffic flow. Trafficmaster, a private firm, sells data on hold-ups to sat nav companies
Specs cameras Catch drivers who think they can slow down before a camera and then speed up again. They measure average speed between two points. There are 60 Specs sites on urban 20mph zones and motorway contraflows around Britain
Gatso cameras The original, first tested in Britain in 1992. There are now thousands of these yellow boxes across the country using radar beams to measure speed, and the word Gatso has become a generic term for speed camera
Truvelo cameras These can prove who was driving the vehicle and thus prevent drivers trying to fob off their points onto somebody else. Unlike traditional Gatso cameras, the 700 Truvelos on UK roads face oncoming traffic to snap the vehicle and driver
Truvelo D-Cam Two traps for the price of one. Now on test on the A4 in London, this is the first to act as both a traffic light camera and a speed camera. The £30,000 digital system can store 100,000 images. More are expected on UK roads later this year
Parking/bus lane cameras CCTV installed by some authorities in London and other major cities to take the place of wardens. They watch for illegally parked vehicles and car drivers who use bus lanes
BelAir200 These boxes on lampposts in the City of London are not spyware but part of a Wi-Fi zone going live in April. At least 14 urban centres, including Manchester and Birmingham, have similar systems
Traffic light cameras These catch drivers jumping red lights by using radar or sensors in the road. An increasing number of local authorities are installing them, including ones in London, Essex, Somerset, Bristol and south Wales
Yellow box junction cameras Currently only in London although legislation now going through parliament will allow other local authorities to install them to catch drivers contravening yellow hatching rules
Highways Agency cameras The agency’s 700 cameras monitor traffic flow on motorways and trunk roads. They relay images to regional control centres and the national centre in Birmingham. The information is used to warn drivers of jams and accidents
Congestion charging cameras There are now 338 automatic numberplate recognition cameras across the London congestion zone, which stretches from Kensington and Chelsea in the west to Tower Hill in the east
Where one might find surveillance cameras useful - to warn motorists of congestion (like on the approaches to the notorious traffic blackspot at Hindhead on the A3) guess what - there aren't any !
Obsession with 'speed' and 'traffic offences' means that better uses for such cameras are completely overlooked. What we need in this country is better traffic management, which concentrates more on keeping traffic flowing and reducing congestion, rather than milking the motorist. Perhaps the Highways Agency could take note. It used to be a pleasure to drive, but sadly this is a thing of the past, with 'big brother' watching one's every move....
Robert Blackman, Fareham , Hampshire
I live in Los Angeles, and we are just beginning to see the first stoplight cameras. I wonder how long it will take until we get to where you are...
Gus, Los Angeles, USA, CA
While I disagree with speed cameras and thoroughly agree with all the practical points made against them (i.e. they are a distraction, often it is safe to exceed the speed limit under suitable conditions), I think its quite ridiculous to argue that they are merely used to spy on us and that because of speed cameras we no longer live in a democracy. Furthermore, I think it is perfectly reasonable to have cameras for other purposes such as stopping people parking illegally, catching people who jump red lights and drive the wrong way down one way streets as these are extremely dangerous.
Ben Stack, Lymington, UK
Do you wonder people destroy cameras? Compared with the continent (just travelled 2,500 miles) the UK situation is disgusting, but plenty of new uncluttered roads using EEC (our!) money. Clog up the system by questioning all NOP and letter content: they get fed up before you do. Remember that New Labour are helping their mates in big business to make money with all this equipment - carbon traded by makers? Also every time new things happen more 'jobs for the boys/quangos' and the sucker motorists pay to get a few more off benefit. A few years younger and I'd be gone from Rip Off Britain..........
FER308, Cromer, U.K.
it has reached the point where i am saying sod all the surveillance and let me live with the risks and i am speaking as a retired police officer; democracy? liberty? don't make me laugh.
steve green, preston, u.k.
Its about time you limeys had a revolution .
Thank god i left the UK over 40 years ago
brian lee, medina, usa ohio
Many of these devices are a GREAT distraction from driving and be it intentional or not one tends to suddenly slow down when one spots such a device! And that can and does cause accidents.
Also being an ex-pat coming home to visit and driving a rented car I very often find myself being close to paranoid about anything that looks like a camera!
Scobie-John LE MAY-GRELLAN, Tokyo,, Japan
The police state is here so much for democratic Britian. We are sending our troops all over the World in the name of Demoracy when are the troops cominghere to restore our Democracy.
Dick Cummings, Lasswade, Scotland
Paul of Durham said it for me.. You add in the other article in the times,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1530593.ece
There is a sleezy load of old labour mates , out to steal our cash by puttting in these high tech surveillance schemes to spy on us . . The project costs involve talk, all they do is talk about the roads .All we want for them to do is to build us some new roads..
Last week one digger doing the work , whilst 7 suits in high viz jackets were all talking about the project. Which was really just clearing a small embankment.
rgds
bill
bill, essex,
The installation of hundreds of speed camera is a danger to the ordinary motorist who uses the roads to make a living. Cameras have no reagrd for the conditions of the roads and time of day. It is perfectly safe to travel above the set speed limit when conditions and time of day allow.
Speed cameras cannot, in any way be said to be, insatlled for the protection of road users - this is a lie.
Families can suffer terrible consequences through indiscriminate speed cameras.
GET RID NOW
Frank USher, Swansea,
The majority of the country are against these devices, surely if we all refuse to pay the fines and accept the points there's nothing the government can do, because all-in-all it's us that provide their mandate!
Joel, Essex,
This story demonstrates that the claimed purpose of surveillance is to reduce crime, etc, is false. If the UK is the most highly surveilled place in the world, one would therefore expect a significantly low crime rate - which is clearly not the case. Surveillance is not about crime, it is about power and representation.
Paul Sant-Cassia, Durham,
sir,its nearly impossible for an outsider to drive in london.you are human you could do mistake.could you tell the the prson who has imposed this fine of £50 pound that ,how long it takes to earn £50 for a person who is little over on minmum wage nearly a day .we are common people not like the politicians who get money for asking questions in parliment or other scams.the way govt is forcing people in to misery .the only solution seems is to revolt against these extortions
kanwal sidhu, tunbridgewells, england
Surely you have realised by now that speed cameras have little to do with preventing traffic accidents and a great deal to do with fund raising and surveillance. Accidents in which excessive speed was a factor are only some 7%. Traffic fines are a hidden tax on motorists. What you have in UK is a control-freak government that wants to know where its subjects are, what they are doing and who they are doing it with; 24/7. Speed cameras are part of the surveillance. Why do you suppose that the government made such a fuss about tinted screens some years back? It was about identifying the driver and front seat passenger. Your mobile phone and credit card have been turned and are now government agents. Sounds paranoid I know, but theres the inescapable conclusion the government wants a larger segment of the population to have a criminal record. Keep in mind that a criminal record will make emigrating that much more difficult, even to Australia.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan