Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

Diesel engines used to be dismissed by most drivers as too dirty, noisy and slow even to consider as their next car purchase. But their greater efficiency is attracting a record number of motor-ists, according to figures published to-day by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.
By 2011 sales of diesel-powered cars will outstrip petrol-powered cars as millions more drivers seek to avoid the heavy tax penalties announced last week for fuel-inefficient vehicles.
Diesel accounted for 40.2 per cent of the 2.4 million cars sold in Britain last year, compared with only 13.8 per cent in 1999. It has already overtaken petrol in terms of the total fuel consumed by all vehicles in Britain. Last year drivers bought 25.5 billion litres of diesel and 24 billion litres of petrol.
Despite costing 5p-10p a litre more at the pumps than petrol, diesel proves more economical for most drivers because it delivers 10-20 per cent more miles for the same fuel.
The showroom tax of up to £950 for the biggest gas guzzlers, which was announced in the Budget last week and comes into force in 2010, will encourage more drivers to switch to cars with lower carbon dioxide emissions.
If they choose a petrol-powered car, they will usually have to accept a smaller, less powerful model in order to move into a cheaper road tax band. But if they opt for diesel they can continue to drive a larger car and still benefit from tax concessions for producing less carbon dioxide per mile.
They will have to pay about £1,000 more than for a similar-sized petrol-powered car, but high mileage drivers will make that back in savings on fuel costs within two years.
A petrol-powered Ford Focus 1.6 will deliver 42 miles per gallon, while a diesel version of the same car will achieve more than 60mpg.
The “dash to diesel” was the main factor behind a small fall in average carbon dioxide emissions of new cars last year to 164.9g/km, down 1.4 per cent from 167.2g/km in 2006.
The society admitted that new diesel cars still emit more air pollutants, such as particulates and nitrogen oxides, than similar-sized petrol cars. But Paul Everitt, its chief executive, said that European regulations on exhaust emissions were forcing manufacturers to fit better filters to diesel-powered cars. By September 2009, with the introduction of Euro 5 engines, there will be no difference in the particulate emissions of diesel and petrol cars. By 2014, with the introduction of Euro 6 engines, parity will almost be achieved on nitrogen oxides.
Mr Everitt called on the Government to abolish the 3 per cent surcharge in the company car tax regime for drivers choosing diesel cars. He said: “With diesel engines rapidly being cleaned up, there will no longer be any justification for this penalty.”
The AA said that the popularity of diesels had leapt because drivers no longer had to accept lower performance. Paul Watters, the AA’s head of roads policy, said that the victory of an Audi diesel at Le Mans in 2006, which prompted the race organisers to change the rules, had demonstrated the transformation of diesel technology.
He said: “The introduction of turbo diesels and systems to reduce vibration and noise were the biggest factors. You used to hear a diesel car coming a mile away because it sounded like a tractor. Now, you would be hard-pushed to tell a diesel from a petrol car if you were standing next to them at traffic lights.”
The UK Petroleum Industry Association said that diesel was more expensive than petrol, despite having the same duty rate, because oil companies had failed to predict the rise in demand.
A spokesman said: “They made a lot of investment in producing unleaded petrol in the 1980s and 1990s but petrol demand peaked in 1990. The pace of diesel growth has surprised people.”
Why is there little comment about the weekly spiralling differntial between diesel and petrol prices? Over 12 months, 2p/litre has grown to 12p/litre (seen last week in Merseyside) but, because fuel companies are profiting, and Government is pocketing more taxes, neither is prepared to do anything.
This affects not only motorists - those who have gone for better economy are now being penalised - but the entire population - distribution costs, etc, escalate.
The Times and Sunday Times used to be campaigning newspapers, but are virtually silent on this latest example of Rip-Off Britain.
Perhaps we need to go back to referring to these matters in costs/gallon; the differential sounds so much worse at 55p/gallon, and the costs seen there (120p/litre) as £5.45/gallon.
Stop just sitting back and shruging as we accept "the inevitable" - get on the bandwagon, expose, publicise and REVERSE this outrageous LEGALISED THEFT
Alan Riley, Aberdeenshire, Scotland
David West, Unfortunately diesel is no longer noticeably cheaper than petrol in France. I live there permanently and wish I could report otherwise.
B Lucas, Carcassonne, France
The only good reason for buying a diesel is TORQUE. Lots and lots of torque. Properly designed diesels are just as quick as gasoline engined cars. And not having to rev the snot out of the engine to get decent torque is soo relaxing. You can have it both ways: It's a diesel! I'm doing my bit to curb global warming! (But you just don't tell the members of the "mileage uber alles" crowd that it goes like stink.) Hypocritical? You bet! Just as big a hypocrite as Fat Al Gore.
Phil Rodgers, Myersville, MD, USA
Ah! What we need is tax incentives to have second homes, so we dont spend so much time commuting!
Pete, Chichester & London,
I agree with Andrew, the country is in it for the milking of its country folks. No matter what they say about going green, the reasons don't stack up for taxes they put up in the budget.
Jack To, Hong Kong,
Come on guys, the game's not worth the candle. Emigrate, you know you will eventually, so sooner rather than later and beat the rush. Because bottom line: Britain's going down.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
Quote <Didn't they mention the other week that diesel fumes cause brain damage?
Next it will be a brain damage tax
Nigel, London, Hertfordshure>
Dear Nigel
They say lost of things about diesel but it is all "suspicion" none are ever proved.
The real damage is done by the 2% benzene in petrol a KNOWN carcinogen with NO safe exposure level according to the World Health Organisation.
No CO in diesel fumes so they won't kill you if breath them and Nox is controlled by EGR and the cat. Unlike the cat on a petrol engine that creates poisonous H2S until it warms up properly.
Steve Canner, St Ives, UK
Diesel fuel is quite a lot cheaper sur le continong than petrol. Why is this when it's dearer in Britain? Do I detect a rip-off?
ben foster, penley,
If diesel is so much more efficient and clean, why does it cost so much more? In France for example it is noticeably cheaper than petrol. Surely it makes sense, like green sense, to do the same here.
David West, Templecombe, UK
Didn't they mention the other week that diesel fumes cause brain damage?
Next it will be a brain damage tax
Nigel, London, Hertfordshure
Terry, the oh-so-clever Government is withdrawing the tax saving on LPG over time. You spend £1000+ now on converting a car to LPG, and find it money wasted in about 2 years time as it will cost the same as conventional petrol, but is marginally less efficient, so you use more.
Tim, Bath,
The chancellor is probably rubbing his hands with glee. Once the majority switch to diesel, in will come a number of new taxes all based on the need for conservation and eco friendliness ofcourse.
Hamad Lone, London, England
Why don't people insist on Liquid Petroleum Gas ? It's half the price of petrol, the mpg is the same, and no nitrogen oxides are produced.
Terry Dell, Weybridge, UK