Scotland Staff
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
Scotland Staff
A prominent human rights lawyer's criticism of the verdict in Scotland's first terror trial was condemned yesterday by a judge as an “angry and petulant” outburst.
Three senior judges cleared Aamer Anwar of contempt of court but delivered a stinging rebuke, saying that they expected better of the lawyer who represented Mohammed Atif Siddique, 21, a student found guilty of providing material on bomb-making and weapons training, and threatening to become a suicide bomber.
After Siddique's trial at the High Court in Glasgow last September, Mr Anwar condemned the verdict as “a tragedy for justice and freedom of speech”. He claimed the computing student's case was heard in an “atmosphere of hostility” after the attack on Glasgow airport and alleged that the prosecution was driven by the state”.
In a television interview he also described some of the evidence against Siddique as “farcial”. Lord Carloway, who heard the 19-day trial, accused the solicitor of making “disparaging remarks” about him, the jury and the prosecution. He passed the decision on whether contempt of court had been committed to the High Court.
Yesterday at the High Court in Edinburgh Lord Osborne said Mr Aanwar's statements “embody angry and petulant criticism of the trial process and a range of political comments concerning the position of Muslims in our society”. He said that no contempt of court had been committed, but that Mr Aanwar had failed to meet the standards expected. “Regrettably, we do not think that those standards were met in this case and the court is entitled to expect better of those who practise before it.”
Mr Anwar was greeted outside the court by a crowd of supporters, including Tommy Sheridan, the former Solidarity MSP, whom he represents. Mr Anwar said: “I never set out to
win a popularity contest, but I was taught it is a lawyer's duty to fearlessly represent his clients.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

Dubrovnik, the Dalmatian Coast and Montenegro
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Aamer Anwar has lost more cases than he has won. He could have asked for a postponement of the case if he thought his client would be adversely affected by a hearing so soon after the Glasgow bombing attempt. But he didn't and we are entitled to ask why.
David Hume, Edinburgh, UK